Send As SMS

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

HE WROTE: Beginnings

The opening of a novel is tricky. The most important words you write are the first ones-- well, not really. The most important words are the first ones in the published book which most likely are NOT the first ones you wrote.

In many novels, the 'problem' that is the core of the plot, is introduced very quickly. Usually in the first pages. And it has to be interesting and hook the reader. As does the character. The reader has to care about the character very quickly.
Or else the reader stops.

Prologues: The reason I used prologues was because in most of my books, the problem existed before the start of the book. For example, the premise of my Atlantis series is "What if the force that destroyed Atlantis comes back to threaten our present world?" So the prologues in the various books show that force destroying an ancient city. Of course I also used dual timelines in some of those books so let's not get into that In fact, I had time travel AND parallel universes in that series and you want to talk about getting a headache trying to keep track of that. I eventually see Jenny and I, her and I, writing a time travel-alien conspiracy-vampire-romantic-thriller-comedy-with a prologue. And a sniper who deals death in the dark. Say that five times fast.

In a thriller, often the writer leads with a prologue that shows the antagonist. I agree with Jenny's point in that we are then hooking the reader with the wrong person. The only reason the opening chapter is called a prologue is because it's out of time sequence with the rest of the book.

To confuse the situation more, not only is there a difference between trouble and conflict, sometimes there is a difference between the problem and the initiating event. For example, in LOST GIRLS which will come out next year, besides having, gasp, a prologue, the problem is that there is a team of pissed off covert operatives in the United States wreaking vengeance on the families of those who betrayed them and left them for dead. The initiating event is the kidnapping of the daughter of one of those men. But then, one thing I learned is that my protagonist doesn't become aware of either the problem or the initiating event right away. Because if he does, then there isn't enough time to develop his character in his normal environment. For example, using a, gasp Terry Brooks forgive me, movie: In Stargate they open with a prologue. Digging up the Stargate in like 1914 or whatever. We shift to present day. When we go to Kurt Russell, the protagonist, he's not aware of anything. He's home, sitting in his son's room, with a gun in his hand. We learn later that his son found his gun and accidently shot himself. Which sets up Russell's willingnes (motivation) later on to stay with that bomb on the other side of the Stargate. BTW my book, THE ROCK, had a gate very much like the Stargate and came out first. Don't get me start on LOST-ATLANTIS.

Agnes is due 1 July. No sweat, I say as Jenny exchanged 30 emails this morning where she asked deep questions like: Now why is Shane climbing in through the window and not knocking on the front door?

I'm also in the throes of trying to figure out my next 'Mayer' book. I just can't get started. And I've always started my books at the beginning, which sounds redundant, but isn't. As per Jenny's suggestion, I might start this one by writing the resolution, which I can see and feel strongly about. Maybe that will shake me out of my funk.

Something also to remember, is that the opening scene often mirrors and foreshadows the climactic scene. So sometimes you can't write the opening until you get to the end, then go back and rewrite.

I'm not as concerned about 'what' happens in my opening scene as to tone. Or voice. Whatever you want to call it. I really believe, when you cut to the bone, the key to DLD and Agnes is voice.
But I could be wrong.
I was wrong once in 1978. Or was it 79?

7 Comments:

At 25/1/06 1:19 PM, inkgrrl said...

It was probably 1977.

 
At 25/1/06 1:50 PM, dt said...

"I eventually see Jenny and I, her and I, writing a time travel-alien conspiracy-vampire-romantic-thriller-comedy-with a prologue. And a sniper who deals death in the dark."

Ooh, that sounds good. I'd buy that one.

 
At 25/1/06 5:56 PM, ol' biddy said...

You feel strongly about the end, and funked about the beginning. Sounds like you already hear the message from your Mayer Boys in the Basement. Start typing before they go back to playing poker with clams!

Go, Bob!

 
At 25/1/06 9:23 PM, Anonymous said...

Okay, gotta love the Stargate analysis (though not a big fan of the movie - I like the show on Sci-Fi!)and must admit I had no idea Terry Brooks wrote that book (sure hope it was better than the Star Wars books, ick).

 
At 25/1/06 9:38 PM, Wendy said...

Don't know about 1977 but definitely wrong today :)

 
At 26/1/06 1:23 AM, ZaZa said...

Prologues are scene setters, like establishing shots or scenes shown under the credits in a movie - this is what the protag is up against or this is part of the protag's background. You, as a reader, can ignore them, but you might not get something later because of that.

No prologues is one of those rules that you, as a writer, need to ignore if it means that you're going to have to try to shoehorn in a bunch of backstory later on if you follow it. I'm fine with prologues, in general, and I've never found yours to be obtrusive.

Yes, you can work around it, but it will probably be obvious, contrived and do bad things to your story. So, no prologues, RMOAG.

 
At 26/1/06 8:28 PM, Etain MacDougall said...

I rather liked the prologues in your Atlantis series. They definitely were not infodump. I thought they were quite cleverly written and wanted to know what happened to the characters once the prologue ended.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home